Annino v. City of Utica
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Taylor, J. (dissenting).
The jury had warrant to find that the defendant chose to fulfill its obligation to use reasonable care to prevent automobile drivers from driving into the open manhole at night —in all kinds of weather reasonably to be anticipated — by placing a loosely attached “ flare ” light or “ bomb ” (so called) upon a tripod standing over the manhole; that plaintiff and the driver of the automobile approaching the manhole at night during a heavy rainstorm and in the exercise of reasonable alertness and at a reasonable speed did not see the fight and contact between the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parnell v. Holland Furnace CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Snowden v. . Town of SomersetNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Burrows v. Livingston-Niagara Power CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Kalinowski v. Truck Equipment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Walsh v. Central New York Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.