Fleet National Bank v. Liberty
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1DissentLevy, J.
[¶ 12] The Court’s opinion is, in my view, contrary to the Legislature’s intent to have all provisions of Article 3-A of the Uniform Commercial Code apply to all types of negotiable instruments, including the precise class of promissory notes at issue in this case. I therefore respectfully dissent.
A. Article 3-A of the U.C.C. Applies to Negotiable Demand Notes
[¶ 13] Article 3-A of the U.C.C. was enacted in Maine in 1993, prior to the defaults asserted by Fleet Bank as the basis for this action. As its prefatory note makes clear, Article 3-A is intended to provide a uniform and national…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lewiston Firefighters Ass'n, Local 785 v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Johnson v. McNeilSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- State v. TaplinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
- Samples-Ehrlich v. SimonColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Premier Capital, Inc. v. DoucetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.