Legal Opinion
The Navemar
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 6, 1939No. 208PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
102 F.2d 444 (1939)
THE NAVEMAR.
COMPANIA ESPANOLA DE NAVEGACION MARITIMA, S. A.
v.
CRESPO et al. (DE LOS RIOS, Spanish Ambassador, Intervener).
No. 208.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 6, 1939.
Lynch & Hagen, of New York City (Charles W. Hagen, Julius I. Puente, Henry C. Eidenbach, and John S. Bull, all of New York City, of counsel), for Fernando de los Rios, Ambassador of Spain to the United States, intervening petitioner-appellant.
Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, of New York City (T. Catesby Jones and James W. Ryan, both of New York City, of counsel), for libellant-appellee.
Before…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. BelmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hebe Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Compania Espanola De Navegacion Maritima, SA v. the NavemarSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Banco De Espana v. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Rich v. Naviera Vacuba, S.A.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1961
- Linea Sud-Americana, Inc. v. 7,295.40 Tons of LinseedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939