Legal Opinion
Miller v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 13, 1950No. Nos. 974-980PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
The seven appellants are here resisting a judgment requiring them to vacate houses in Bellevue, a low rent housing project owned by the United States of America. The judgment was entered in a test case which by stipulation was to govern the decision in these seven cases.
We note at the outset that the Supreme Court has held that the property here involved is not subject to the.District of Columbia Rent Act. United States v. Wit-*172tek, 337 U.S. 346, 69 S.Ct. 1108, 93 L.Ed. 1406.
The first argument advanced in behalf of appellants is that the Navy Department, at whose instance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. WittekSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Insurance Co. of North America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Zoby v. KosmadakesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Gordon v. TinoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
3Cited by2 opinions
- Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. The Madison Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Rudder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954