Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Tino

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1946No. 454PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAGETT, Associate Judge.

Plaintiffs, as landlords, sued defendant for possession of a house on the ground that they had purchased the property and desired it in good faith for their immediate and personal use and occupancy as a dwelling.1 Defendant moved to dismiss principally upon the grounds that he had not been served with a proper 30 days’ notice and had not been properly served with process. This motion was overruled by the trial court, and the case proceeded to trial before a jury. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals from the judgment on the verdict.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bell v. WestbrookDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Department of Housing & Community Development v. PittsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Bevins v. LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Renshaw v. SwiftDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API