Gordon v. Tino
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLAGETT, Associate Judge.
Plaintiffs, as landlords, sued defendant for possession of a house on the ground that they had purchased the property and desired it in good faith for their immediate and personal use and occupancy as a dwelling.1 Defendant moved to dismiss principally upon the grounds that he had not been served with a proper 30 days’ notice and had not been properly served with process. This motion was overruled by the trial court, and the case proceeded to trial before a jury. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals from the judgment on the verdict.
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bell v. WestbrookDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
3Cited by4 opinions
- District of Columbia Department of Housing & Community Development v. PittsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Bevins v. LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- Renshaw v. SwiftDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956