Legal Opinion

Pringle v. Hilo Mercantile Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court, Fourth Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

The only assignment of error that need be noticed is that the verdict of the jury was rendered by nine only of the twelve jurors, the other three dissenting. The action was trespass and was tried at the last January Term of the Circuit Court. ,

"Whatever force the former statutes of Hawaii, which permitted verdicts to be rendered by nine of twelve jurors, may have had during the period intervening between the annexation of these islands to the Hnited States and the establishment of the territorial government (see Haw. Star Newspaper Co. v. Saylor, 12 Haw. 64;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Evans v. GeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Cowles v. BuckmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  3. Hawaiian Star Newspaper Ass'n v. SaylorHawaii Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chow v. DickeyHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Kainea v. KreugerHawaii Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API