Legal Opinion

Brous v. Imperial Assurance Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.

This action is brought upon a policy of insurance issued by defendant to plaintiff for a term of one year, commencing October 5, 1926. The policy is what is known as a riot and civil commotion policy and, among other things, insures plaintiff against direct loss or damage caused to property contained in the premises 1370 Broadway, New York city, by (1) riot; (2) riot attending strike. Plaintiff is a manufacturer of dresses. He occupies part of a loft at the above address. During the pendency of a strike called by the garment workers’ union some of his employees, who were members of the union,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RunnelsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  2. Marshall v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Adamson v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Marshall v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Bituminous Casualty Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. James T. Lynn, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  3. Salem Mfg. Co. v. First American Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  5. Metpath, Inc. v. Birmingham Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API