Legal Opinion

United States v. William Neal Perry

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 4, 1963No. 14184PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTINGS, Chief Judge.

Defendant William Neal Perry was charged in a one count indictment with a violation of the Dyer Act, Title 18, U. S.C.A. § 2312. 1 Following a trial to the court, without the intervention of a jury, defendant was found guilty. He now appeals from the judgment of conviction.

Defendant was represented in the trial below and on this appeal by court appointed counsel.

The errors relied on for reversal concern the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction of the violation charged in the indictment and the identity of the motor vehicle alleged to have been stolen and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  3. Cox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  4. Leonard Thomas Dixon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  5. United States v. DrexelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rayford Lavaughn Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. United States v. Edward TalbotCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. Leland Eugene WennerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API