United States v. Drexel
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The indictment, so far as material, read as follows: “The defendant * * * did unlawfully * * * receive and conceal * * * a certain motor vehicle to wit: a Roosevelt Sedan, Motor Number 910630, Serial Number 709882, which said motor vehicle had theretofore been stolen at the City of Philadelphia, State of Pennsylvania, and transported * * * in interstate commerce.” It will be observed that, although these words allege that the ear had been stolen, they do not allege that it was '(moving as” or “a part of” or that it “constituted” interstate commerce as the statute required. Section 408, title…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Nalle v. OysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Grimsley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Hardesty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Grandi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Nicholas CrowderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- McNally v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
- United States v. Stephen Wora and George WoraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.