Legal Opinion

Brady Irrigation Co. v. Teton County

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1938No. 7,881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson

This action was brought to secure a permanent injunction against the members of the board of county commissioners and the treasurer of Teton county to restrain them in their official capacities from securing a tax deed. The county was a party defendant. Judgment went against the defendants, and the county alone has appealed from the judgment.

In 1906 the Teton Cooperative Reservoir Company was organized as a corporation under the laws of Montana as a mutual company for the sole purpose of storing water and delivering it to its stockholders for irrigation, and not for profit. Its capital stock…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. LewellynSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Middle Creek Ditch Co. v. HenryMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Sun River Stock & Land Co. v. Montana Trust & Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HoldrenMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Mittelstadt v. BuckinghamMontana Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Storrie Project Water Users Ass'n v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Mohland v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Ackroyd v. Winston Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API