Legal Opinion

Grizzell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 7, 1966No. H-416PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

2Per curiam

Grizzell filed a motion to vacate-in the lower court pursuant to Criminal-Procedure Rule 1, Ch. 924, F.S.A. Appendix. Upon consideration of the Rule-1 motion the lower court entered its order-reciting that it could not entertain said', motion because a direct appeal from Griz-zell’s criminal conviction was presently-pending before the District Court of Appeal, First District, which order in effect denied the Rule 1 motion. From this-order Grizzell then appealed to this Court,, filed a brief and the State then filed', a motion to quash or dismiss the appeal..

*343We are of the…

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MenesesSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Barton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Brooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  4. Meneses v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Hurst v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API