Grizzell v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
2Per curiam
Grizzell filed a motion to vacate-in the lower court pursuant to Criminal-Procedure Rule 1, Ch. 924, F.S.A. Appendix. Upon consideration of the Rule-1 motion the lower court entered its order-reciting that it could not entertain said', motion because a direct appeal from Griz-zell’s criminal conviction was presently-pending before the District Court of Appeal, First District, which order in effect denied the Rule 1 motion. From this-order Grizzell then appealed to this Court,, filed a brief and the State then filed', a motion to quash or dismiss the appeal..
*343We are of the…
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MenesesSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Barton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Brooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Meneses v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Hurst v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.