Legal Opinion
Meneses v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 3, 1979No. 79-183PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Judge.
The appellant seeks review, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), of the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. We reverse for an evidentiary hearing.
The defendant had been charged with a lottery-bolita violation in which the primary evidence against him consisted of wiretap *1153evidence of telephone conversations in which he was allegedly involved. After his motion to suppress the wiretap was denied, he entered a nolo plea to the court on January 31, 1977, reserving the right to appeal the denial to this court. During the course of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Andrews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Willie A. Womack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Peel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Ohio Cas. Group v. ParrishSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MenesesSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Francois v. KleinSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Murphy v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Meneses v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981