Legal Opinion
State v. Bellerouche
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 10, 2005No. 55091-8-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
120 P.3d 971 (2005)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Bernard BELLEROUCHE, Appellant.
No. 55091-8-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
October 10, 2005.
Dana M. Lind, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Kathy K. Ungerman, King Co. Prosecuting Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
ELLINGTON, J.
¶ 1 Bernard Bellerouche violated a do not trespass notice and was convicted of criminal trespass in the second degree. We reject his contention that because a driveway may be impliedly open to the public, it is therefore not encompassed by a prohibition against entry. We also hold…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. LaneWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. CredifordWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Cantrill v. American Mail Line, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. LinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- In re Welfare of M.R.Washington Supreme Court · 2022
- State Of Washington v. Steven Lester KezaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington, Resp v. Jalan Saechao Velez, AppCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.