Iversen v. Minnesota Mut. Life Insurance
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtAmidon, District Judge
(orally). If it were not for the fact that I am closely.pressed with work, I should be glad to formulate my views in this case in a written opinion. That, however, is impossible. I am confident that further study would in no way modify my judgment as to the correct disposition of the case. The only advantage it could have would be to furnish a more orderly statement of the grounds of the decision than is possible in an oral opinion.
At the outset, the charges of fraud and insolvency which are made in the bill must be put aside. They are wholly unsupported by the evidence. On the contrary, this…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Northwestern Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Leininger v. North American National Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
- Polk v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1905
- Bogert v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1914