Legal Opinion
Cellular Phone Taskforce v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 18, 2000No. Nos. 97-4328(L), 98-4003(Con), 98-4005(Con), 98-4025(Con), 98-4122(Con)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN M. WALKER, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners Cellular Phone Taskforce (“CPT”) and Ad-Hoc Association of Parties Concerned About the Federal Communications Commission Radio Frequency Health and Safety Rules (“AHA”), joined by numerous other individuals and groups, appeal from two final opinions and orders in which the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) promulgated guidelines for health and safety standards of radio frequency (“RF”) radiation, established streamlined procedures for meeting requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act for FCC licensees that are in compliance…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cellular Phone Taskforce v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000