Legal Opinion

Brockway Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided January 10, 1941No. 387PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

Three several motions by the plaintiff are here under consideration. In order to determine these, it is necessary to have an understanding of the issues in the suit at bar.

During and prior' to 1928, defendant herein, Hartford-Empire Company (hereinafter called Hartford) was engaged in a patent infringement litigation with defendant herein • Hazel-Atlas Glass Company (hereinafter called Hazel) and its wholly-owned subsidiary Kearns-Gorsuch (hereinafter called Kearns). Plaintiff herein (hereinafter called Brockway) made an agreement with Hazel and Kearns to cooperate and…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Independent Productions Corp. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  2. Smith v. BentleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  3. Cravatts v. Klozo Fastener Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. Félix A. Thillet, Inc. v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1966
  5. United States v. LustigDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API