Legal Opinion

Kirkeby v. Furness

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 20, 1995No. 94-3231PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

In response to picketing by anti-abortion demonstrators, the city of Fargo, North Dakota adopted a revised ordinance restricting residential picketing. The issue is whether the district court erred in denying the demonstrators’ motion to enjoin enforcement of this ordinance as an unconstitutional abridgement of their right to speak. We conclude that the motion should have been granted, and therefore reverse and remand the matter for further proceedings.

I

The City of Fargo had an ordinance which prohibited “picketing the dwelling of any individual in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  3. Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. PLANNED PARENT. MN, N. DAKOTA, S. DAKOTA v. RoundsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Hubbard Feeds, Inc. v. Animal Feed Supplement, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. Phelps-Roper v. NixonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Bandag, Incorporated v. Jack's Tire & Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. Lucero v. TroschCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API