Legal Opinion
Lucero v. Trosch
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 8, 1997No. 95-6326PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
This abortion protest ease comes to us on an appeal of the district court’s order granting, in part, plaintiffs’ application for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs Dr. Bruce Lucero and New Woman All Women Health Care brought this action against several abortion protesters under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994 (“FACE”), 18 U.S.C.A. § 248. Plaintiffs also raised supplemental state law claims under Alabama nuisance law. See Ala.Code § 6-5-120 et seq. The district court denied plaintiffs’ application for a preliminary injunction on the FACE claim,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Al-Site Corporation and Magnivision, Inc. v. Vsi International, Inc. And Myron Orlinsky, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Paul Stephens v. Nick Degiovanni, individuallyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Quebell P. Parker v. Scrap Metal Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Blab T v. of Mobile, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.