Legal Opinion
Mullen v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided August 17, 2015No. 1:15CV158-LG-RHWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS ■■ ■ >
LOUIS GUIROLA, JR., Chief Judge.
BEFORE THE COÚRT is the Motion [40] to Dismiss filed by Defendant Roll-Royce Corporation. Rolls-Royce Corporation requests dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), for failure to state a' claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), or alternatively, for a more definite statement pursuant to Fed.R,Civ.P. 12(e). Plaintiff Brenden Mullen has responded, and Rolls-Royce Corporation has replied. After due consideration of the submissions and the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Thomas W. Wilson v. David W. Belin and G. Robert BlakeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Seiferth v. Helicopteros Atuneros, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilmington Trust, N.A. v. Lincoln Benefit Life Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2018
- Farani v. FileDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2021