Legal Opinion

State v. Leeson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2003No. 02-764PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Appellant Nathaniel Leeson (Leeson) was charged in Montana’s Eighth Judicial District Court with operation of an unlawful clandestine laboratory in violation of § 45-9-132, MCA (2001). He filed a Motion to Dismiss arguing § 45-9-132, MCA (2001), is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. The District Court denied the motion. Leeson appeals. We affirm the District Court.

¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in finding that § 45-9-132, MCA (2001), is not unconstitutionally vague on its face?

¶4 2. Is § 45-9-132, MCA (2001), unconstitutionally overbroad?

B…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. State v. MartelMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. NyeMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. City of Whitefish v. O'SHAUGHNESSYMontana Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matheney v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. SamplesMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. FellersMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. PearrowMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Matheney v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API