Legal Opinion

Latimer v. Williams

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The sole question presented upon this appeal is whether the heirs of James F. Latimer (the deceased husband of testatrix), who were to take one half of the trust residue upon the death of Mary Widney (the life beneficiary) , are to be determined as of the date of the death of the testatrix or as of the date of the death of the life beneficiary.

The general rule is that when a will provides for a limitation over to the “heirs” of the testator or of some other person already deceased, to be determined by a statute governing the intestate succession of property, following the expiration of a life…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Salter v. . DrowneNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. In re the Estate of FishelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  3. Roth v. KarstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Flint v. Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Merrill Trust Co. v. PerkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First New Haven National Bank v. First New Haven National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. Crow v. Marshall & Ilsley BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Hanley v. CravenNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Cleveland Trust Co. v. FrostOhio Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. PuchnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API