Legal Opinion

Freedman v. Denhalter Bottling Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1919No. 3322PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; J. D. Gall, Judge. Action by Max Freedman, by his guardian ad litem, Bessie Freedman, against Denhalter Bottling Company. From ue-nial of a motion to nonsuit and an order affirming a judgment against defendant in the city court, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiff, Max Freedman, by his guardian ad litem, Bessie Freedman, obtained a judgment for the sum of two hundred and iift^ dollars 'against the defendant in the city court of Salt Lake City. The defendant appealed the case to the district court of Salt Lake county, where, upon a trial to the court, the plaintiff again recovered judgment for the same amount. The defendant brings the case to this court on appeal, and assigns errors as follows: (1) That the district court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a nonsuit; (2) that-it erred in making certain findings of fact therein-after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cederson v. Oregon Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. DunlapIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Taite v. Boorum & Pease Co.New York Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peteler v. RobinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Jensen v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Morgan v. Bingham Stage Lines Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Zimmerman v. AuerbachUtah Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API