Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Auerbach

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1932No. 5226Published

1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.

This is an action by plaintiff for personal injuries to her hair and head alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant’s employee in giving her hair a permanent wave. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals and assigns error in the refusal of the trial court to admit certain offered evidence and in instructing the jury. The negligence charged in the complaint is that “plaintiff employed defendant, * * * to treat her hair and scalp in such a manner and by the use and application of such electrical contrivances and appliances as to result in giving to her hair a permanent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Freedman v. Denhalter Bottling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API