In re the Postsentence Review of Hudgens
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
¶1 Today, the Department of Corrections (DOC), joined by the State, invites us to disregard or limit, the application of State v. Miller, 110 Wn.2d 528, 536, 756 P.2d 122 (1988) by reversing the trial court’s application of Miller and decision to deny the State’s motion to amend Jeremy Hudgens’ invalid sentence for third degree rape. We decline the DOC’s invitation because under Miller, the trial court correctly allowed Mr. Hudgens to elect between withdrawing his guilty plea and insisting on specific performance of his plea agreement. However, we remand for the trial court to make clear…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BarberWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. BarberWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State Of Washington, V. Navin Avery MilkoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
- Personal Restraint Petition Of Ryan RocquinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Jorge L. Dominguez VeraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.