Legal Opinion

Parks v. Ainsworth Pet Nutrition, LLC

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided April 18, 2019No. 18 Civ. 6936 (LLS)PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOUIS L. STANTON, U.S.D.J.

Plaintiff Markeith Parks brought this putative class action, on behalf of himself *244and all others similarly situated, against Defendant Ainsworth Pet Nutrition, LLC and its wholly owned subsidiary, Rachael Ray Nutrish (collectively, "Rachael Ray Nutrish"), alleging claims of deceptive business practices and false advertising under the New York General Business Law, breach of express warranty, and unjust enrichment. Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint, or alternatively, stay the action until the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") issues guidance regarding the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bruin v. Bank Of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  2. Bush v. WellPet, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
  3. Carter v. Ralph Lauren CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  4. County of Albany, New York v. Eli Lilly and CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
  5. Elise Augustine v. LesserEvil LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API