Legal Opinion
Solomon v. Loud
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1912No. Docket No. 58PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error to Iosco; Connine, J. Case by Selig Solomon against H. Kimball Loud for fraud and deceit. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Per curiam
We consider only whether the trial court ought to have set aside the verdict of the jury and granted a new trial upon the motion of the plaintiff and appellant. In denying a new trial the court, among other things, said:
“ The remaining grounds for a new trial are based upon the alleged misconduct of the defendant and his attorney in hiring one Joseph Eaton, a juror, ‘ to watch the jury ’ and plaintiff and his counsel. From the affidavits submitted with the motion, and from what came to the knowledge of the court immediately after the trial, I find the facts connected with this incident as…
2Cited by6 opinions
- People v. SchramMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
- Hoskin-Morainville Paper Co. v. Bates Valve Bag Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. LeveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Coats v. Lee & Eastes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
- McCartney v. SaulMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.