Siegman v. Rosen

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered July 3, 1997, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendants’ cross motion to “preclude evidence of all alleged pre-March 2, 1986 transactions between the defendants”, unanimously modified, on the law, to restrict the aforesaid limitation to plaintiffs claims for fraudulent conveyance, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The six-year Statute of Limitations for claims for fraudulent conveyance is not applicable to and, accordingly, should not have been invoked to preclude proof relevant to, that aspect of plaintiff…