Legal Opinion
Williams v. Tweed
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 23, 1994No. C7-94-653PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellant, who was injured falling into an abandoned septic tank, challenges the district court’s summary judgment for the former landowners. We affirm.
FACTS
Sometime between the years 1956 and 1965, respondents Lester and Lavonne Tweed installed a septic tank at their home in Pequot Lakes. The Village of Pequot Lakes subsequently constructed a sewer system and required all abutting homeowners to connect to the system. In 1965, the Tweeds connected their home to the sewer system and abandoned the septic tank. The Tweeds sold their home and moved in 1967.
In 1992, appellant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Meister v. Western National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Wittmer v. RuegemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McLain v. Andersen Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Loren Zutz Deb Zutz Ron Zutz, Doing Business as Zutz Farms, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Case Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Nelson v. Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Christensen v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Merritt v. MendelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.