Legal Opinion
Dean v. Texas Steel Co.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided September 30, 1993No. 3:92-cv-00806PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND
MEANS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a motion to remand, filed November 10,1992 and supplemented on January 7, 1993. After carefully considering said motion, response, reply, and the applicable law, this Court is of the opinion that the motion is meritorious and should be GRANTED.
Plaintiff in this cause is a former employee of Defendant who was injured on the job. Defendant, who opted not to subscribe to Texas workers’ compensation coverage, subsequently terminated Plaintiff. Plaintiff brought an action against Defendant in the 236th District Court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- William Jones v. Roadway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Foust v. City InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1989
- Hodge v. BSB Investments, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Gibson v. Wyatt Cafeterias, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1992
- Britt v. SuckleDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American International Specialty Lines Insurance v. Rentech Steel, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Walker v. Health Benefit Management Cost Containment, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1994
- Figueroa v. Healthmark Partners, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
- Markel Insurance v. S.T.C.G., Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
- Illinois National Insurance v. Hagendorf Construction Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.