Britt v. Suckle
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Justice, District Judge.
The plaintiff brings this civil action under the second subsection of 42 U.S.C. § 1985, a part of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, whose range has only been adumbrated by the few decisions seeking to construe it. The subsection reads in its entirety as follows:
j)t ¡fc * * * *
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bell v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Esther Lee Begay, Etc. v. The Kerr-Mcgee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Martinez v. IBP, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
- Sims v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas CityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Gibson v. Wyatt Cafeterias, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.