Legal Opinion

State v. FERNANDO A.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 3, 2009No. 18045, 18103Published

1Opinion of the Court

981 A.2d 427 (2009)

294 Conn. 1

STATE of Connecticut

v.

FERNANDO A.[*]

Nos. 18045, 18103.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Argued March 12, 2008.

Decided November 3, 2009.

Steven D. Ecker, Hartford, with whom was Alinor C. Sterling, Branford, for the appellant (defendant).

Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were David I. Cohen, state's attorney, Kevin J. Dunn, assistant state's attorney, and David R. Applegate, deputy assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Jane R. Rosenberg and Susan Quinn Cobb,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited90 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API