Legal Opinion
Charm Promotions, Ltd. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company v. Mel Goldman, Third-Party-Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 9, 1973No. 72-1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff Charm Promotions, Ltd. appeals from a jury verdict- — in this diversity action — in favor of defendant Travelers Indemnity Company to recover under a fidelity bond written by Travelers covering Charm’s “employees.” We affirm.
In January, 1966, Charm was incorporated in Illinois pursuant to an agreement between Automatic Accounting Corporation (Automatic) 1 an Illinois corporation owned equally by Goldman, Brown, and Albert Heisler (the “Chicago Group”), and Weingeroff & Glick Enterprises, Inc. (Enterprises), a Rhode Island corporation owned by Frederick and Louis Weingeroff, George…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shields v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. CompagnaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. James R. Hoffa, Benjamin Dranow, Zachary A. Strate, Jr., S. George Burris, Abe I. Weinblatt, Calvin Kovens, and Samuel HymanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- United States v. John Theodore GlickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- James Acree v. The Minolta CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Michael Petrycki v. Youngstown and Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Leona Dixon, Administratrix of the Estate of John C. Dixon, Deceased v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Skill v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- American Honda Motor Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.