Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Union Bank

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 2, 1993No. 92-55304Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

9 F.3d 1550

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Arnold Robert ABRAMS, et al., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

UNION BANK, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Earle HAGEN, Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of

Stephen H. Henry, Defendant-Appellee

v.

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Counter-defendant-Appellee

and

California Franchise Tax Board Counter-defendants-Appellees

and Dr. Robert M. Peck, as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. Gilbert Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. United States v. Waddill, Holland & Flinn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API