Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Attorney General v. Boyd

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1885No. 1206PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Quo warranto to determine respondent's right to hold the office of county assessor of Washoe County under the provisions of the act making the county treasurer of Washoe County ex officio the assessor. (Stat. 1883, 73.)

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Belknap, C. J.:

Under the statute approved March 1, 1883, entitled “An act fixing the salaries of county officers in certain counties in this state, and other matters relating thereto” (Stat. 1883, 73), the county treasurer of Washoe County is made ex officio the assessor of the county. The question presented for consideration is, whether this provision is not unconstitutional.

It is claimed by relator that the provision is a violation of article 4, sec. 25, of the constitution, which provides that “ the legislature shall establish a system of county and township government, which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Haley v. StarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1881

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Edmonds v. HerbrandsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Groves v. County Court of Grant CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Town of Holland v. LammersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Sawyer v. DooleyNevada Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Hall v. Bell CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API