State ex rel. Haley v. Stark
Supreme Court of Florida
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Westcott
This is an information in the nature of a quo warranto, the relator, Haley, claiming the right to hold and exercise the powers and franchises of the office of Mayor of Eernandina as against the respondent, Stark, who now holds and executes the said office as he, Haley, relates, unlawfully and without legal warrant or authority.
On the 4th day of April, A. D. 1881, at an election held in pursuance of law; Haley was elected to the office of Mayor. He qualified and entered upon its duties. This election was held under a municipal, corporate organization had under the general act providing for the…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Parshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Town of Enterprise v. State ex rel. Attorney-GeneralSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. City of Avon ParkSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Galveston & Western Railway Co. v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1903
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. BoydNevada Supreme Court · 1885
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.