Legal Opinion
Garnett v. State Ex Rel. Bank Commissioner
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 6, 1932No. 22459PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
The state, on relation of the Bank Commissioner, .filed a separate suit against each of the defendants, E. L. Gar-nett, H. íi. Harris, L. T-i. McConnell, J. A. Clarkson, and A. Kahle, respectively, in the district court of Jackson county, to enforce the statutory liability imposed by section 4122, C. O. S. 1921, by virtue of said defendants appearing on the records of the Oil i-zens State Bank of Altus as stockholders of said bank. For the purpose of trial, the cases were consolidated and separate judgments rendered. In this court the cases have been consolidated under No. 22459.
It was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Board of Comm'rs of Knox Cty. v. AspinwallSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Scott v. DeweeseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Nelson v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Eaton v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gonseth v. K & K OIL COMPANYMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Agosta v. Southwest Breeders, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
- Harris v. State Ex Rel. Bank Com'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Band Com'r v. ClarksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Bank Com'r v. KahleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.