Wixon v. Raisch Improvement Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHEY, J., pro tem.
In this case the respondent interposed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the transcript was not filed within the time prescribed by the rules of the supreme court. The transcript was filed on the forty-fourth day after the bill of exceptions had been settled and filed in the office of the county clerk of Santa Clara County. On the forty-second day after the settlement and filing of the bill of exceptions, respondent served his motion to dismiss the appeal accompanied by affidavits sufficient in form and substance. On the date of the hearing, in the absence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harris v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- McPhee v. LavinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Towne v. GodeauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Simonsen v. L. J. Christopher Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Insurance v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Keyes v. HawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Cowan v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Goldberger v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Shiya v. RevieaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953