Tomczak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BARRY, Senior Judge.
Ronald Tomczak, the claimant, and Pro-Aire Transport, Inc., the alleged employer, have each appealed an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (the Board) which affirmed a decision of the referee denying the claimant benefits.
The claimant, an owner of a tractor, was hauling goods for Pro-Aire, an interstate common carrier, when he was injured in April of 1987. At that time, he was assisting in the loading of Pro-Aire’s trailer when he was struck by a fork-lift operated by an employee of General Foods, a customer of Pro-Aire. The injury occurred at a plant of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kirkwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Morgan v. Giant Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- J. Miller Co. v. MixterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Middletown Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- ACS Enterprises, Inc. v. Norristown Borough Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Tri-Union Express v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Dana Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- US Airways v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Johnston)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.