Legal Opinion

Valley Savings Bank v. Mercer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 30, 1903PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Frederick County (Henderson and Motter, JJ.)

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

This is a suit by the Valley Savings Bank of Middletown on a promissory note for $600. The makers of this note are the thirteen defendants and J. W. Downey. The note is joint and several dated April i ith, 1901, and payable one year after date to order of R. S. Delauder & Co. The following endorsements appear on it: “Received of J. W. Downey thirty-three 33-100 dollars on within note, and he is hereby released from any further payment on the same;” and “Received of E. D. Hobbs thirty-three 33-100 dollars on within note.” Neither of these was signed, but it appears by the evidence that Downey…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cheever v. Pittsburgh, Shenango & Lake Erie RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Maitland v. Citizens' National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  3. Totten v. BucyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  4. Yates v. DonaldsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  5. Washington Booth v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lanasa v. BeggsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  2. Scandinavian American Bank v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Murphy v. PennimanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  4. Edelen v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  5. Arnd v. HeckertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API