Legal Opinion

United States v. Victor Harvey Smith

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 22, 1980No. 79-1706PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

After a mistrial, the district court denied Smith’s motion to dismiss the indictment. Smith argues that the double jeopardy clause required that the motion be granted. We affirm.

On the second day of Smith’s criminal trial, the court learned that the 87-year-old mother of a juror had suffered a stroke, that the juror had been with her at the hospital since 3:00 a.m., and that the juror could not come to court. No other facts were known. Since the court had neglected to select an alternate juror, it asked the parties if they would consent to proceed with a jury of 11. The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Himmelfarb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. United States v. Clarence Christian NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Wilson v. BellequeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. David Allen Bates Ricky Lee ArcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API