Legal Opinion
Fitzgerald v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 28, 1980No. 26-79PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKunzig, Judge
This case concerns the procedural propriety of plaintiffs involuntary disability retirement for psychiatric reasons. In particular, plaintiff challenges the Government’s method of releasing certain medical information upon which the discharge was based. For the reasons stated below, we find *217that the agency did fail to adhere to the relevant regulations but that such failure was harmless.
Plaintiff began working for the Department of Transportation (DOT) as a clerk-typist, GS-4, but her supervisors complained that she was inefficient, a poor typist, rebelled against her supervisors and got…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scroggins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Frank Camero v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Gaines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Pascal v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Camero v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Spawr Optical Research, Inc. v. BaldrigeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- Giglio v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Reilly v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Arthur E. Hackett v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.