In re the Marriage of Hughes-Kuda
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeVORE, P. J.
Husband appeals from the trial court’s amended general judgment of dissolution. ORS 107.105. The judgment directed wife to pay husband spousal support of $2,750 per month for six and one-half years. Husband challenges the award, contending that the trial court erred as a matter of law by failing to award support indefinitely. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, and we affirm.
Husband does not seek de novo review, ORS 19.415(3), and we do not believe such a review is warranted in this case. See ORAP 5.40(8)(c) (de novo review appropriate only in exceptional cases). As…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Marriage of BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- In re the Marriage of MortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- In Re the Marriage of BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- In re the Marriage of CullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- In re the Marriage of JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.