Blaisdell v. Department of Public Safety
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
ACOBA, J.
We hold that (1) the plain language of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 353-20 (1993) 1 expressly authorizes Respondent/Defendant-Appellee Department of Public Safety (DPS or Respondent) to maintain only one individual trust account for prisoners pertaining to sums collected while committed, (2) Respondent violated HRS § 353-20 because it maintained two accounts with respect to Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Richard Blais-dell (Petitioner), one of which restricted withdrawals to purposes determined by Respondent, and (3) interest accrued on Petitioner’s accounts…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. GaylordHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Bremer v. WeeksHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hickenlooper, Governor of Colorado v. Freedom from Religion Foundation, IncSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
- Arquette v. State.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
- Mesa County Board of County Commissioners v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Tokuhisa v. Cutter Management Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009
- Anastasi v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.