Legal Opinion

Blaisdell v. Department of Public Safety

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 2008No. 28736PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that (1) the plain language of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 353-20 (1993) 1 expressly authorizes Respondent/Defendant-Appellee Department of Public Safety (DPS or Respondent) to maintain only one individual trust account for prisoners pertaining to sums collected while committed, (2) Respondent violated HRS § 353-20 because it maintained two accounts with respect to Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Richard Blais-dell (Petitioner), one of which restricted withdrawals to purposes determined by Respondent, and (3) interest accrued on Petitioner’s accounts…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. GaylordHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bremer v. WeeksHawaii Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hickenlooper, Governor of Colorado v. Freedom from Religion Foundation, IncSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  2. Arquette v. State.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Mesa County Board of County Commissioners v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  4. Tokuhisa v. Cutter Management Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Anastasi v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API