Legal Opinion

Gordon v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1983No. 82-900PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1228FERREN, Associate Judge:

Appellant argues, first, that his conviction for armed robbery, D.C.Code §§ 22-2901, -3202 (1981), cannot stand because the trial court failed immediately to instruct the jury, during the government’s case-in-chief, that prior inconsistent statements of the government’s own witness (in this case grand jury testimony) could be considered only in evaluating whether the witness’ trial testimony was credible, not to establish the truth of the prior statements. Second, appellant claims reversible error in the trial court’s admission of testimony by a police officer based on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. Earnest McClainCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. CruzIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Derrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Owens v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. R. & G. Orthopedic Appliances & Prosthetics, Inc. v. CurtinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API