Legal Opinion · Dissent

Weyrauch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 1, 1994No. 94-0869Published

1DissentGlickstein, Judge

I dissent because of the circuit court’s approval of the jury instruction which was given. The majority opinion begins:

WE AFFIRM the sentence and judgment below, finding no error with the jury instructions given.

The dissenter, Circuit Judge Makemson, was correct, in my view, when he said:

I dissent with respect to the issue regarding the jury instructions. I believe the trial court’s failure to use the current standard criminal jury instructions on DU-BAL was error, and that the instructions, as given, may have misled the jury.

Petitioner requested that the jury not be instructed on blood…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re Trial Courts of the Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal CasesSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Standard Jury Instructions-Criminal CasesSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Cruse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. Doyle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API