Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rehard v. Miles

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 14, 1939No. 44457Published

1DissentOliver, J.

(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent. The record shows appellees left everything in the hands of Johnson, reserving no discretion or control to themselves. He had full charge and control, gave all orders and superintended the work.

Appellant is entitled to the benefit of the most favorable view of the evidence rule. Johnson testified:

“I told him [Ed Rehard] to go in and help Snelson take off this section of the center pole.”

Considering the record in the light most favorable for appellant I think there is no justification for the conclusion reached that he was not working under the orders and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Huggard v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Nelson v. SmeltzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. Bell v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Oestereich v. LeslieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API