Legal Opinion

Bell v. City of Philadelphia

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 1984No. Appeal, No. 856 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Marion F. Bell (Appellant), appeals from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County which affirmed the determination made by the City of Philadelphia, Board of Pensions and Retirement (Board). For the reasons set forth below we reverse the decision of the court below and remand the case to the Board for rehearing.

Appellant suffered injuries in two separate falls while at work, for which she filed a workmen’s compensation claim. This claim was decided by our Court earlier1 and is not before us today.

This appeal concerns Appellant’s allegations of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Horn v. Township of HilltownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Gardner v. RepaskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Donnon v. Downingtown Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Bell v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RegaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Shah v. State Board of MedicineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Philadelphia Board of Pensions & Retirement v. AmantoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. RegaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. PHILA. BD. OF PEN. & RET. v. AmantoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API