Columbia Weighing MacH. Co. v. Bondurant
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
ANDREWS, J.
There are a number of matters presented in the petition for rehearing in this case that are not covered by ■the opinion.
Attention is called therein to the ease of Whitaker v. Columbia Weighing Machine Co., 131 Okla. 194. 268 Pac. 255, as holding that an implied warranty survives the 30-day inspection period. That case was decided June 12, 1928, after the filing of the briefs in this case, and was not 'called to the attention of the court. In view of the fact that one of the parties to that action is the same as one of the parties in this suit, and the contract involved…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Heindselman v. HarperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Garr v. MinnickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Citizens Bank of Headrick v. SingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Whitaker v. Columbia Weighing MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928