Legal Opinion

Heindselman v. Harper

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 29, 1923No. 11526PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This action was originally instituted in justice of peace court in Washington county, Okla., by the filing of a bill of particulars by the defendant in error, plaintiff in the court below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant in the court below. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as in (he court below.

After a trial in the justice of the peace court, and verdict by jury in favor of the p’aintiff, an appeal was perfected to the district court of Washington county, Okla. Said cause was tried in the district court of Washington .county, Okla., on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pomponio v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  2. Elwood Oil & Gas Co. v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Rose v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Protest of Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. Gulf Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Holzbierlein v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Mitchell v. DadasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Garr v. MinnickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API