Rothenberg v. Board of Regents of University of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.
Petitioner has been found guilty of undertaking to perform a criminal abortion on one Edna Aaron and of having actually performed such an operation on one Leona Lang.
The Aaron finding is based upon the testimony of Aaron and Bergh, both paid investigators of the Department of Education. . There is serious doubt whether under the so-called substantial evidence rule this testimony is sufficient to sustain the determination when considered against the background of the entire record. The evidence of these investigators at best is not of a highly satisfactory nature.
Several errors were committed…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Garabedian v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Taibbi v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Zimmerman v. Board of Regents of the UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Allen v. WalshDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Epstein v. Board of RegentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.